Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It still blows my mind. Shouldn't the government audit their contracting companies for egregious issues like this? Seems extremely reckless not to.
 help



I've been through a handful of SOC2 audits and they've never asked us to _prove_ that we aren't storing passwords in plaintext or with reversible encryption (we weren't).

This is why so much of vetting & compliance is toothless. You can have robust change management, physical security, network security, identity management, etc. policies but absolutely nobody wants to spend enough on audit & enforcement to make them meaningful.

The gov't will make you _claim_ that you do all of these things before awarding a contract, but they won't ever check.

Good actors will do the right thing regardless because they know the consequences of cutting corners.


I'm pretty shocked as well. I thought every company stopped doing this like 20 years ago? Even for a legacy system that is a long time to continue storing credentials like that.

20 years is rookie numbers in these systems. I guarantee it’s been at least 40 years since a single fuck was given.

My wife works in IT at a mid sized city. They still store credentials in source control.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: